Emmanuel Daniel | Author, Entrepreneur, Futurist
  • Home
  • Topics
    • Book- The Great Transition
    • Geopolitics
    • The Future of Finance
    • Travelers Tales
    • Reviews
    • Footnotes
  • Videos
    • Speeches and Presentations
    • Podcasts, Interviews and Conversations
    • Site Visits and Travelogue
  • Biography
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Topics
    • Book- The Great Transition
    • Geopolitics
    • The Future of Finance
    • Travelers Tales
    • Reviews
    • Footnotes
  • Videos
    • Speeches and Presentations
    • Podcasts, Interviews and Conversations
    • Site Visits and Travelogue
  • Biography
No Result
View All Result
Emmanuel Daniel | Author, Entrepreneur, Futurist
No Result
View All Result
Home Podcasts, Interviews and Conversations

Confronting our limits in the age of AI

In this conversation with Koen Vanderhoydonk on The Connector Podcast, I explored how artificial intelligence is reshaping financial institutions, why governance will define its trajectory, and how banks must rethink their role in an age of disintermediation.

admin by admin
February 19, 2026
in Podcasts, Interviews and Conversations
0
30
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Linkedin
How-Global-Finance-Influences-Geopolitics

I joined The Connector Podcast with Koen Vanderhoydonk to discuss how artificial intelligence (AI) is altering the foundations of financial services and what it means for institutions navigating this transition.

Koen opened by referencing a speech I gave at the beginning of the Year of the Snake, where I drew on cultural mythologies to frame AI as a civilisational force. Across cultures, the snake symbolises humanity’s aspiration for power and immortality, but also renewal rather than eternal life. The metaphor remains relevant today as AI expands human capability while confronting us with the limits of our control.

Much of the anxiety surrounding AI stems from this tension. We are building systems that scale intelligence, yet we are still constructing the governance required to contain it. Regulation, data controls and ethical frameworks are emerging globally, not to constrain innovation but to ensure AI remains a servant to humanity rather than an autonomous force.

From there, we moved into the implications for financial services. Hyper-personalisation, long anticipated in banking, is now operationally viable. Institutions can tailor products, interfaces and risk models to each customer in real time, while facing new exposure to bias, fairness and compliance risks.

Governance again becomes central. Principles-based regimes rely on interpretive judgement grounded in core values, while rules-based systems codify detailed prescriptions for conduct. Each produces distinct consequences for how banks deploy AI, manage algorithms and ensure accountability. The industry remains in an exploratory phase as these models evolve alongside the technology itself.

We then turned to AI’s structural impact on banking.

Financial services has always been an intermediation business, positioned between transacting parties to facilitate trust and settlement. AI, particularly agentic AI, begins to erode that centrality. End users can construct their own financial interfaces, automate decisions and bypass institutional layers.

This shift extends into operations. AI compresses the technological complexity of banking across the front, middle and back office, weakening technology superiority as a source of competitive advantage.

Banks therefore face a strategic imperative to redefine their role in the transaction chain and articulate the value they create in an environment where access and execution are increasingly decentralised.

When asked to prioritise the industry’s greatest challenge, adapting to AI stands above resisting disruption or cultivating innovation culture, because those challenges are embedded within the AI transition itself.

Here’s what we discussed:

  • AI governance as the defining constraint on technological power.
  • The civilisational anxieties underpinning today’s AI debate.
  • Hyper-personalisation and its fairness and compliance risks.
  • Agentic AI and the erosion of financial intermediation.
  • The need for banks to redefine institutional value.

Listen to the full conversation below.

Tags: Agentic AIAI GovernanceAlgorithmic AccountabilityArtificial IntelligenceBanking Intermediation ModelCompliance RiskData GovernanceDecentralised Finance InterfacesDisintermediationEthical AI FrameworksFinancial InstitutionsFinancial Services IndustryFront Middle And Back Office TransformationHyper-Personalisation In BankingKoen VanderhoydonkPrinciples-Based RegulationReal-Time Risk ModellingRules-Based RegulationThe Connector Podcast
Previous Post

When banking disappears into platforms and AI takes over the interface

admin

admin

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Blog Visitors Comments

  • Neville Edwards on I Reject All Forms of Exceptionalism
  • Why should Shanghai aspire to be an international financial center? – Emmanuel Daniel on Creating a successful international financial centre
  • Creating a successful international financial centre – Emmanuel Daniel on Why should Shanghai aspire to be an international financial center?
  • SA on The full briefing and dialogue on my book
  • Mark Aarssen on “Canada’s still a better bet than the US.”
Subscribe to Updates*

Important Links

  • TAB Global
  • The Asian Banker
  • TABInsights
  • The Banking Academy
  • Wealth and Society

Follow Me

  • Biography
  • Contact

Copyright 2026 © Emmanuel Daniel. All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Topics
    • Book- The Great Transition
    • Geopolitics
    • The Future of Finance
    • Travelers Tales
    • Reviews
    • Footnotes
  • Videos
    • Speeches and Presentations
    • Podcasts, Interviews and Conversations
    • Site Visits and Travelogue
  • Biography

Copyright 2026 © Emmanuel Daniel. All Rights Reserved.